If one were to try and understand why farm attacks and subsequent murders in South Africa are so brutal and barbaric one need look no further than the underlying ideologies that ferment these murders. There seems to be a pathological mystery within criminals that seem so bent on the total destruction of human dignity, ghouls whose actions cannot possibly be based merely on some romantic sentiment of past inequity.

Farm invasions, land redistribution and farm murders in Southern Africa are all based on the same seedy doctrine of unfairness becoming fairness for the working class and underprivileged. Political agendas in this ravening wolf in sheep’s clothing facade are supposedly addressing the inequities of the past. They are not. That is not the main pivot, the protagonist is the abnormal hatred driving these murders, not born of ‘inequity’ or colonial resentment but born of political poison.

Is it possible that political ideals that sound like a possible solution for equity and the betterment of mankind could be in fact be triggering man’s most homicidal instincts? Is it possible that innocuous sounding ideologies, when entertained could result into a macabre display of man at his most demonic? A normal, moral, peace loving human being has the ability to turn savage and negate every inbred conscience, but why is that? Would one dare to imagine that certain key words in political communication are actually words that trigger man’s most destructive qualities?

There is an interesting correlation between the first farmer in history to be murdered, its motive and the same motive being camouflaged in present day ideologies. In the Biblical story of Genesis the first ever murder was committed by Cain on Abel. Both were farmers by definition, Abel was a shepherd and Cain toiled the earth.

One need not to be an adherent to the Torah or the Bible to understand the underlying implications leading to Abel’s murder. There was neither law nor religion installed in that social cohabitation, yet it seems Abel was aware of his sinful tendencies and nature. His religious sacrifices were of the firstborn of his flock, highly indicative that he somehow understood that the blood of his purest animal was a submissive form of prayer for atonement. Cain had no such inclinations or repentant attitude - he brought the first fruits of his toil with total disregard to whatever the Almighty was supposed to do with a sack full of cabbages and potatoes. This is indicative of his total disregard for spiritual landmarks. It further illustrates his arrogance and self belief is his own works and ideas. These are purely my observations, whatever other explanations biblical scholars and commentators can give us, they and the bible seem to agree on the reason Cain murdered Abel. It was envy.

A corrupt tree is incapable of producing good fruit. The principles are plainly evident; if the root of an idea is evil it will be rotten and incapable of producing anything good regardless of its toil for results. Regardless of terminology, man only does what he thinks is ‘good’. When the concept of good is twisted it becomes easy to launch him on a destructive path. The whole political manifesto in Southern Africa is loaded with key or ‘trigger’ words. When evil disguises itself it also ‘changes’ some words, words that call evil good and good evil. The political ideology feeds man’s twisted concept of fairness and justice until man’s tendency for charity is totally withered. Until he is in the grip of uncontrollable forces.

Mbeki, Mugabe and Marx

Enter two Southern African leaders who share a commonality, Robert Mugabe and Thabo Mbeki are both fanatical followers of Karl Marx. Marx and colleague Engels issued the ‘Communist manifesto’ in 1948. It distinguished itself from other forms of socialism, urging a social reform and called for all workers to revolt against existing regimes. This bears a striking similarity to the ‘struggle’. Hitler’s bible, Mein Kampf was also called ‘the struggle’. It seems that the ‘struggle’ is always against something more excellent than they can produce. The whole conceptual theory is based on overall fairness for the average man. The subsequent social and economic arguments at times even sounds plausible but one has to go right back to the beginning of it to confront its purpose and challenge its authenticity. Back to even before the pen met the paper of the manifesto.

The concept of fairness in life breeds many questions and unfortunately it is one of those key words that everybody has a different opinion on. It is a concept that is as plain or complex one makes it, it is a grey area. It is a grey area that has been exploited by politics forever.

Both Cain and Abel had equal opportunities, both had different results.

Cain’s illusion of unfairness and its misconception led to envy. Envy led to murder. According to the gospel of Cain fairness by his standards had been exacted.

Contrary to popular belief Marx was once a Christian. So was Friedrich Engels, who later became a conservative theologian. They were both poisoned by liberal theologies and reading through their works reflects a progressive apostate mindset. An interesting aspect of Marx was his early poetry, much like Hitler who abandoned his paintings for politics. One of Marx’s poems:

I wander godlike and victorious
Through the ruins of the world
And, giving my words an active force,
I will feel equal to my Creator.

Before we go into this phrase ‘giving my words an active force’; Karl Marx put himself equal to God and talks of ruining His creation. It is plain to see that he was not an atheist, but a believer who was in rebellion against God. He saw himself as equal to God if he could destroy whatever God had created. The whole fruit borne of this is what Marx judges as fairness or equality - in his own heart. Whether one believes in God or not - does it not bother anyone that the man whose ideology they follow based his ideals on a destructive obsession against the creator of the universe? Many civil wars and liberation ‘struggles’ in Africa have been based on Marxist principles and ideologies. Is it little wonder that the first thing overall communism closes is any form of worship to God? A place where merely owning a Bible is equal to a crime against the state? People argue endlessly about political ideals and policies but what they are really arguing around the symptom, not the root. If the root is evil the tree is evil. The words of Marx and the exacting results of his ideologies are remarkable. What is more remarkable is another signature in farm attacks, leaving a bible on the victim’s chest.

Marxism has greatly influenced the development of modern socialist thought; further, many scholars have considered Marx a great economic theoretician and the founder of economic history and sociology. What they don’t realize is that the elements of his theories are filled with trigger words. What they may not see is that intellectually they can flirt with Marxism but it is a destructive force that is triggered through a sequence of words in all the right places, or phrases. Just like a ritual in occult practices following a format.

On an economic basis of equity, Trotskyites and the like could make a plausible and reasonable argument. What they cannot explain is the spiritual problem that always surfaces, overall Communism consistently brings despots, mass murderers and absolute madmen to power. Since they don’t believe in the spiritual it immediately dismisses this as any form of argument against them. Yet it is the main argument. Why is it that an ideal that promises overall fairness and equity for all produces exactly the opposite? Time after time, with a guarantee to fail? With another aspect guaranteed in the result: genocide? Could it be that there is an evil code written into the ideal disguised as a solution? Yes, Marxist ideals merely offer a ‘solution’, that implies there is a problem. The ‘problem’ is what you define it, what you want it to be to suit the ideal. Their ‘solution’ creates more problems than ever existed.

There was never a ‘problem’ as long as free trade existed amongst men. The only problem was envy, coveting and failure by individuals. Socialism masquerades as the solution to a problem it invented. Evil does that, there was never a problem in the Garden of Eden. The snake invented one, equality with God. Same as Marx…

Whilst we stare in disbelief at Marx’s poetry unfolding in the ongoing carnage in Southern Africa we have to accept that what goes on in the mind’s of Marxist idealists is self deception and illusions of grandeur. We also have to accept that these attacks are not about ‘redistribution’ of wealth, it was never distributed to anyone to be ‘re’ distributed to anyone else. The attacks are plain and simple against God’s order. Whilst God ordained a method that feeds a nation our idealist friends have concocted their chaotic principles, spoken in the devil’s language with key words. The attacks are against a symbol and spiritual landmark, that is the success of farming in Southern Africa.

The problem with Cain when faced with accountability for Abel’s death was one of stone cold remorseless denial. The same sentiment lingers, absolute denial that anything wrong has been done. Instead there was a cover up by Cain as there is with the South African government.

The reality is that in Southern Africa truth has long been exchanged for a lie. A remorseless, unrepentant lie. And since they don’t believe in God nor acknowledge him they have no one to be accountable to.

They are left with history to learn from and history will always repeat itself. History also shows us that all things come to an end. It always does.

In the mid 1800’s a very famous preacher in England Charles Spurgeon had lit up the heavenly road. His messages had brought such conviction and moral standards that even the national newspapers printed the whole Sunday’s sermons on a Monday. His influence was great and far reaching, but he was a humble man. One day another preacher approached him and shared how much he would have loved to have the same influence as him. Charles asked him how big this man’s parish or church was. "I look after about one hundred people", he replied. "That is quite an enormous amount to account for on judgment day don’t you think?" was the reply.

I wonder how much ‘good’ any of these monsters can do that will account for the scattered graves in Africa’s countryside? Considering that good and some good work in itself could redeem. Cain seemed to think so.